The Dry Ice Engine - an Alternative Energy Source for Mars Colonies

Share on Facebook849Tweet about this on TwitterPin on Pinterest1

High School Students Construct Dry Ice Engine To Power Colonies on Mars 

How do you think a Martian colony will be powered?

Solar Energy?

Nuclear?

For most of us, that's as far as it goes. Some might consider something a little more 'exotic' -- like geothermal energy --  but for the most part solar and nuclear energy are the two types of power most often discussed.

Chase Bishop and James Thompson.

Two North Carolina high school freshman, though, Chase Bishop and James Thompson, have a different idea on how to power a Mars colony.

Dry ice.

That's right. Dry ice.

The frozen, solid form of carbon dioxide.

The Dry Ice Engine

The 'Dry Ice Engine' began as a school project --  a project these young scientists entered into the TIME 4 Real Science Program -- a student-led independent research and scientific discovery program in North Carolina begun in 2006 by teachers Jennifer Williams and Mary Arnaudin.

Over the last 9 years, the ​TIME program has engaged 120 high school students across North Carolina that have conducted innovative, unique, and authentic research on local topics including:

  • kudzu bug control,
  • chestnut tree restoration,
  • the isolation of endophytes from local medicinal plants, and
  • the identification of endophytes that produce biofuels.

The research that these students have performed is top tier. In fact, many scientists who have mentored the students and observed the projects have commented that the work is on par with that of graduate students.

That's high praise, but these two may have just have upped the game.

​The Idea

Chase Bishop, an outdoorsman and devout christian who is also an avid football player who hopes to play one day in college, originally came up with the idea for the 'Dry Ice Engine'.

While sitting on a bus during a school trip to Raleigh, NC to observe other competitions and the work other students were doing -- a brainstorming session, if you will -- Chase got a little bored and started doing what many of us do.

He started watching videos on YouTube.

Specifically, he was looking at dry ice 'bombs' and the power they pack. Inspired, Chase thought about how much power the expanding gas was creating and whether or not those forces could be harnessed and used to drive a piston.  

An engine, in other words.  Something that could generate power and even potentially become a new type of generator.

There's a pro​blem, though.

It​ takes a lot more energy to freeze carbon dioxide into dry ice than you will ever get back -- at least here on Earth.

So Chase talked it over with James, a math wizard and space enthusiast who plays piano in the school's jazz band​. 

James had originally planned a different TIME project focusing on the craters of  Mercury and how they might prove the existence of vulcanoids  (a theoretical band of asteroids between Mercury and the Sun) , but after their talks, Chase thought, "What about Mars? There are massive frozen carbon dioxide deposits at the Martian poles. Dry ice may take a lot of energy to freeze carbon dioxide on Earth, but on Mars it is freely available."

If it could be easily heated, that would mean ...​

So the two joined forces and the idea for the 'Dry Ice Engine' on Mars was born.

Dry Ice Engine question

Credit: Chase Bishop/James Thompson

​Pressure Engine Basics

The basics of the 'Dry Ice Engine' rest on a simple -- but effective -- form of power generation here on Earth: The Pressure Engine.

There is nothing new about pressure engines. They use the energy stored in fossil fuels to turn water into useful mechanical or electrical energy through heat transfer, and are therefore also called heat engines -- the most common type being the steam engine.

Basically, in a steam engine, fuel is used to vaporize the water into steam. The steam is collected and contained in a pressure vessel which, once an appropriate pressure is reached, releases that steam to power a turbine (for electrical energy) or pistons (for mechanical energy)

Water is an ideal substance for this -- it is widely available and cheaply acquired. More importantly, it is capable of changing phases (from liquid to vapor) within a temperature range that is easily achievable.

That is -- here on Earth.​

On Mars, the situation changes dramatically.  

Although water is available on Mars, it isn't that common. Mars may be wetter than once thought, but it is still a pretty dry place. On top of that, the water that is available is  locked up in ice. Heating it to its melting point and then to its boiling point to use it as a working substance requires a lot of energy.

​Carbon dioxide, however, is plentiful on Mars and -- even better -- is readily available in its solid form.

In fact, in a 2011 article by Ron Cowen, it was estimated that the South Polar Cap alone contains somewhere between 9,500 and 12,500 cubic kilometers of dry ice -- enough to double the entire planet's atmospheric pressure if it were ever released.

RELATED: Getting Around on Mars

Martian dry ice also exists close to its “sublimation point” -- the temperature at which a solid turns into gas. 

As Chase and James explained in their paper titled "The Feasibility of a Solid Carbon Dioxide Pressure Engine as an Energy Source for Mars Exploration and Colonization" :

A particularly desirable property of dry ice is its ability to sublimate, or change directly from a solid to a gas at only ­-78℃. That sublimation within a closed container allows for enormous pressures to be reached by relatively small quantities of dry ice.

In other words, on Mars it would only take a small amount of heat to change dry ice into a gas. And that transformation could build up pressures powerful enough to drive turbines or pistons.

But therein lies the challenge.

How can you harness the energy that is released by the sublimation of dry ice and use it to power a heat engine?  

The Project

So the scientific background was set. A theory had been developed. Now it was time to build a method to test the concept and measure the results.

With the mentoring and assistance of retired NASA electrical engineer ​Wes Branning, Chase and James created a pressure engine design using common, off the shelf parts. With funding from the TIME program, they assembled their engine using a simple Arksen pressure vessel, an air hose, and an air grinder that was attached attached to a small generator.

Dry ice engine team and support

Wes Branning, Chase Bishop and James Thompson

Dry ice was crushed and ​added into the pressure vessel by way of a ball valve and allowed to sublimate until a pressure of 90 psi was achieved. 

Dry Ice Engine Method of Operation. Credit: Chase Bishop/James Thompson

Once the correct pressure was reached, a valve on the air hose was opened and the CO2 gas allowed to escape, powering the air grinder and turning the generator.

dry ice engine method of operation (cont)

Dry Ice Engine Method of Operation (Cont). Credit: Chase Bishop/James Thompson

And the result?​

Success!

​Although the electrical potential was not very large (this was a small scale experiment, after all), the results proved that electricity can indeed be generated using the sublimation of dry ice.  

Carbon dioxide is indeed a viable option for heat engines on Mars, possibly exceeding the more common steam engines we use here on Earth.

Dry Ice Engine

Dry Ice Engine. Credit: Chase Bishop/James Thompson

The results were so positive, and the process so well considered, that these two young men were awarded First Place in Technology and Engineering by the North Carolina Student Academy of Science.

They were also awarded the Grand Prize of the TIME competition - an all expenses paid trip to represent North Carolina at the American Academy for the Advancement of Science Meeting in Boston this next February, 2017.

03/2017 UPDATE: Chase and James presented their work to the AAAS and received incredible reviews!  In fact, their 'Dry Ice Engine' has been so well received, they have both been inducted to the American Junior Academy of Science (AJAS).  Well done and congratulations to these budding young scientists!

​Conclusion

Getting to -- and living on -- Mars will be difficult at best. Robert Zubrin, co-author of 'The Case for Mars' and president of the Mars Society, ushered in the idea of using local, indigenous resources to make the possibilty a little more plausible. 

His ideas were absolutely ground breaking at the time and changed the way NASA planned on getting to Mars​. They also reinforced the concept that our future on Mars depends on our ability to use local resources and devise creative ways to exploit them to our benefit.

Simple.

Unconventional.

That's exactly what Chase Bishop and James Thompson did as well with their 'Dry Ice Engine' and unconventional, 'out of the box' thinking. 

Living on Mars may have just become a little easier.​

Here's their full paper if you are interested:

Chase Bishop and James Thompson: The Feasibility of a Solid Carbon Dioxide Pressure Engine as an Energy Source for Mars Exploration and Colonization

You can reach Chase Bishop at: 19hbishop@s.tcsnc.org

Featured Image: Mars One Colony with Solar Panels. Credit: Mars One/Bryan Vesrsteeg

10 comments

  1. Simon Dennis 16 April, 2017 at 12:00 Reply

    I’m wondering if you could create a closed loop system by increasing the pressure to a bit over 10 ATM. The recordings of pathfinder show that at this pressure CO2 ought to cycle from liquid to gas daily on the basis of the ambient temperature. If you have two cavities, one above the other with the turbine in between then as it heats the CO2 will evaporate and pass up to the top cavity generating power. As it cools it will condense and fall to the bottom cavity generating more power.

    If you had many of them you could close the valves on some storing energy either by preventing gas from expanding upwards, or preventing liquid from falling downwards.

  2. Carlos Barrera 21 December, 2016 at 19:25 Reply

    PLUS; *State of the Art, Novel Technology, Featured Project Development / Space, Satellite and Habitat, Power-Plant, Generator, Self-Feed Unit; H2O=>HHO=>H2O=>HHO=>Etc… *4 Systems All in One Unit, One By One, Plus Four-4 Projects added One to Other; *·1-Gearturbine, ·2-Imploturbocompressor, ·3-Dynamic Generator, ·4-Electrolysis System:

    ·1-GEARTURBINE; Rotary-Turbo-InFlow Tech,Have the similar basic system of the Aeolipilie Heron Steam Turbine device from Alexandria 10-70 AD * With Retrodynamic = DextroRPM VS LevoInFlow + Ying Yang Way Power Type – Non Waste Looses *8X/Y Thermodynamic CYCLE Way Steps. 4 Turbos, Higher efficient percent. No blade erosion by sand & very low heat target signature Pat:197187IMPI MX Dic1991 Atypical Motor Engine Type.

    ·2-IMPLOTURBOCOMPRESSOR; One Moving Part System Excellence Design – The InFlow Interaction comes from Macro-Flow and goes to Micro-Flow by Implossion – Only One Compression Step; Inflow, Compression and outflow at one simple circular dynamic motion / New Concept. To see a Imploturbocompressor animation, is possible on a simple way, just to check an Hurricane Satellite view, and is the same implo inflow way nature.

    *Note;Plus-this-Two Projects to complete all the System Work;
    -Self-Feed Unit Space Power-Plant-H2O=>HHO:
    ·3-Dynamic Generator/New Kind.
    ·4-Electrolysis System/BioDesign.
    *(3&4-Hide-Cards-on-the-Hand).

  3. Sunil Liyanage 29 October, 2016 at 11:30 Reply

    Dry ice to be sublimation does the tank been heated so as to dry ice to be evaporated?
    I am not clear about the process.

    • Joel Ammons
      Joel Ammons 29 October, 2016 at 11:33 Reply

      On Mars the tank may have to be heated (residual heat from the habitat might be enough) but here on Earth dry ice will sublimate in the tank naturally – no heating required.

  4. Chase Bishop 27 May, 2016 at 12:59 Reply

    I see where you are coming from Tim. Many people have brought up that point. Our response is that with just the ambient temperatures needed to keep the astronauts alive would be sufficient to sublimate the dry ice like Joel said.. Also a small nuclear isotope could be used just to heat up the dry ice. I feel that with research and design it would be more efficient than solar just because of the distance away from the sun Thank you for your feedback. Without feedback we wouldn’t have gone this far.

  5. Tim Andrews 27 May, 2016 at 08:06 Reply

    Kudos to Chase and James on an innovative idea as well as the organization needed to test, demonstrate and document it.

    As to its practicality on Mars, I have my doubts, and here’s why. The article refers to dry ice as being energy-hungry to produce on Earth, but available on Mars. It’s important to remember that the solid form of CO2 is a low-energy state compared to the gas. There is dry ice on the poles of Mars because it is cold there. Here on Earth it takes a lot of energy to pull the heat out of gaseous CO2 and turn it solid because we are fighting against the warm (relative to dry ice) environment around us. When dry ice goes into the engine it isn’t sublimating because of energy in the ice, it is sublimating because the environment around the ice is so much warmer. The surrounding environment (the tank, the air in the tank, the air outside the tank, etc) is providing the heat that expands the CO2 into gas and drives the pneumatic tool to spin the generator.

    On Mars, unlike the classroom where this engine was demonstrated, the surrounding environment is not so much warmer, and in areas where there is dry ice it is colder. That’s why the CO2 is in solid form. Something is going to have to apply heat to the ice in the gas chamber in order to force it to sublime and drive the generator. So where do we get the energy to do that? One easy answer is sunlight – because it’s freely and readily available on Mars. If we concentrate sunlight with mirrors we could heat the tank and the dry ice inside to warmer temperatures than the surrounding area and drive the engine. Or we could use solar panels to convert sunlight to electricity to run a heater in the tank. That definitely could work but…..

    We then need to ask ourselves a question. What will work more efficiently? We will have to spend energy collecting dry ice and loading it into the dry ice engine (even if we do that with robots, they need power from somewhere). We will have to harvest sunlight with mirrors or solar panels and redirect it to the dry ice engine, losing a percentage of it in the process due to efficiency limits, then run the engine which will lose more power due to efficiency limits until we produce our final electricity. Or, we could simply use solar panels to generate electricity directly with only the efficiency of the panels limiting how much energy is available to us per square foot of solar farm space.

    • Joel Ammons
      Joel Ammons 27 May, 2016 at 08:27 Reply

      Great insight, Tim. Thanks! This may not be the most efficient energy producing method for Mars, but only time and experimentation will tell. Remember, too, that CO2 sublimates naturally on Mars as well – at least during the summer months – so the temperature differential to make use of this idea is not all that great. Perhaps redirecting excess heat from a habitat?

      • Tim Andrews 27 May, 2016 at 10:00 Reply

        Yes it could definitely be powered by the seasonal temperature swing – load it with dry ice in the winter, and then when the climate is warm in the summer use that heat to generate some power, then re-load in the winter. Being available year round, waste heat would be an excellent source of power. The key is recognizing that it is no more powered by dry ice than a steam engine is powered by water. Both engines operate on a phase change from solid or liquid to gas, and that is powered by heat, so finding a suitable heat source will be what is needed to make it viable on Mars.

        After commenting, I followed the link to their paper. What a fantastic job they did, not just with the original concept and testing it but almost more importantly with providing a clear and concise explanation! These two are going to go far.

Leave a reply